December 12, 2009
When the Media ‘reports’ events with a description that is clearly different that what has happened then why are they surprised that we no longer find them credible? The original was written in English…
Is this willful misreading or crashing idiocy? Gadahn says “Muslim” and CNN turns it into “innocent.”
December 7, 2009
Despite mounting evidence that key climate researchers were less than honest, and other indications that the science is not settled, tomorrow 56 newspapers will run a common front page editorial saying we have ‘Fourteen days to seal history’s judgment on this generation’…
Are people contributing to the warming of the planet? How will we know when the ‘scientists’ are behaving so un-scientifically by preventing opposing views from being peer-reviewed (while simultaneously claiming that they should be), by suggesting the criminal deletion of information in response to Freedom of Information requests and by computer code for their models that exposes just how corrupt and fragile their predictions are (in addition to not being able to predict the non-warming of the last decade)? And even so all of these newspapers show their collusion by defending this un-scientific group by not covering ClimateGate and instead making their biases more than clear.
If the search for truth is not an aim of these “news” organizations then their days are truly numbered.
November 23, 2009
Can the bias be any more clear? When the mainstream media acts like a politician then what else should we expect? Their current stock prices tell us where this is leading…
November 20, 2009
How can we trust a “news” organization that simply chooses the narrative that they wish to believe? And when they are proven SO wrong will they come clean?
November 18, 2009
“OF course it is.” says, uh, the New York Times…
This was written in 2004 but why do people deny this today? Biased media sources are fine as long as they admit they are biased. Stop pretending.