Many examples of how change comes to the Associated Press.
If 90% of mainstream media members voted for Republicans instead of Democrats the media would be just as biased but in the opposite direction.
According to the AP, it depends on the party. What bias?
Obama had a record shattering $745,000,000 fundraising haul by rejecting public financing in spite of a written pledge to accept it while McCain abided by his pledge to accept public financing. If the Democratic/Republican roles were reversed the headlines would all be about how the election was bought and paid for with private funds. So what does the AP again choose to highlight? Sexist coverage of funds spent on Palin…
Did you know that bombings are now a positive sign of progress in Iraq? That Obama’s promises are not likely to be kept and that’s OK? That taxpayers didn’t really want tax cuts anyway? The story lines have changed dramatically since the election.