CNN ‘Translates’ for Us

When the Media ‘reports’ events with a description that is clearly different that what has happened then why are they surprised that we no longer find them credible?  The original was written in English…

Is this willful misreading or crashing idiocy? Gadahn says “Muslim” and CNN turns it into “innocent.”

56 Newspapers to Sing As One About Copenhagen

Despite mounting evidence that key climate researchers were less than honest, and other indications that the science is not settled, tomorrow 56 newspapers will run a common front page editorial saying we have ‘Fourteen days to seal history’s judgment on this generation’…

(source)

Are people contributing to the warming of the planet?  How will we know when the ’scientists’ are behaving so un-scientifically by preventing opposing views from being peer-reviewed (while simultaneously claiming that they should be), by suggesting the criminal deletion of information in response to Freedom of Information requests and by computer code for their models that exposes just how corrupt and fragile their predictions are (in addition to not being able to predict the non-warming of the last decade)?  And even so all of these newspapers show their collusion by defending this un-scientific group by not covering ClimateGate and instead making their biases more than clear.

If the search for truth is not an aim of these “news” organizations then their days are truly numbered.

All the News That’s Fit to Bury

Can the bias be any more clear?  When the mainstream media acts like a politician then what else should we expect?  Their current stock prices tell us where this is leading…

L.A. Times With Egg on Their Face

L.A. Times Columnist Uncritically Quoted Star of Latest ACORN Video

How can we trust a “news” organization that simply chooses the narrative that they wish to believe?  And when they are proven SO wrong will they come clean?

AP: All the News That Fits the Narrative…

AP Buries Inconvenient Results of Latest Healthcare Poll

Is The New York Times a Liberal Newspaper?

“OF course it is.” says, uh, the New York Times…

This was written in 2004 but why do people deny this today?  Biased media sources are fine as long as they admit they are biased.  Stop pretending.

NYT Double Standards

Dick Cheney’s advisor made millions by advocating policies that lined his own pockets and the NYT remains silent on the connection.  Oh, except it was Joe Biden and not Dick Cheney…

Treat them all the same Grey Lady.  It is no wonder that you are losing the trust of millions.

ACORN Nuggets

Yet more examples of how the media chooses to ignore only certain stories.

L.A. Times is covering for ACORN

How can we trust the press when they do things like this?  Just report the news of corruption wherever it occurs and stop covering for just one party.

Going After the Messenger

The Mainstream Media completely missed the boat on investigating ACORN and they were scooped by two 20-somethings so what do they do now?  Imagine if they went after Woodward and Bernstein this way (with simple name substitutions):

The proposition seemed outlandish. Two Washington Post reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, would accept information from a secret source who would only be known as “Deep Throat.” This information would be so damaging to president of the United States, it would unleash a scandal that would shake the foundations of the nation’s government to its core.

Woodward and Bernstein deny being beholden to left-wing interests, but admit taking advice in their reporting from left-wing editor Ben Bradlee. They insist that no left-wing organization bankrolled their reporting efforts.

A mainstream media that doesn’t even try to uncover corruption of ANY party is next to worthless when their own party is in power.